The High Court will hear arguments touching on the legalities of ride-hailing apps and plying for hire in the forthcoming case of UTAG v TFL & Transopco UK Ltd.
United Trade Action Group (UTAG) was granted permission to judicially review a decision by Transport for London to grant Transopco UK Ltd an operator’s licence. The principal issue surrounds the use of the FREENOW ride-hailing app although the outcome of the JR will apply more generally to whether instant ride-hailing could be interpreted as “plying for hire”.
It was reported that Mrs Justice Lang held that it was arguably unlawful for TfL to have granted an Operator’s Licence, because Transopco facilitated and encouraged private hire drivers to work off a ride-hailing app despite it being unlawful for private hire vehicles to ‘ply for hire’.
UTAG Director Trevor Merralls, is reported to have said the case will focus heavily on how private hire vehicles (PHV) cannot be pre-booked on the app, but licensed taxis can. On the same FREE NOW app, PHV’s can however be ordered via an ‘immediate pre-booking’, which has drawn discussion over what is an immediate hail and what is a pre-booked journey.
Disclaimer: This article is for guidance purposes only. Kings View Chambers accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken, in relation to this article. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.
Taxi or private hire legal issue?
If you are facing a taxi or private hire legal issue or difficulty, speak to us today for a free no obligation case assessment.